Greetings Comrades,
Lots to say about Andrew Tate, but first a couple updates on this Substack. My plan for 2023 is to write much more - at least two long form posts per week. I will be adding a paid tier, for those that can or want to contribute, but the content will remain free. No need to contribute if you can’t afford it. I’m simply going to use it as a measure of how good of a job I’m doing.
I would greatly appreciate if you would consider liking, sharing, and subscribing if you find any value here.
Consider it a gentleman’s agreement, my content is free, but I work hard on it. The price is clicking one button. You can steal it if you want to be an asshole.
I also greatly appreciate the DMs and feedback I’ve been getting on Twitter.
Disclaimers
I don’t claim to know what is true, and I don’t claim to know what is “good.” All I do is try to dispassionately understand what is.
If you have picked a side regarding Tate, something in this post will trigger you into cognitive dissonance.
There is arguing to win, and there is arguing in good faith to see if your ideas stand up to scrutiny. This will be the latter. Again, I have no idea what the hell is true. I’m just going to explain how I look at this, not that you need to agree with me.
We all have different, education, experience, and values, so naturally, we’re going to come to different conclusions. This will be an attempt to consider this situation from as many perspectives as possible.
Alright, buckle up - this is going to be fun.
Human Trafficking
There’s been a lot of talk about human trafficking in the news over the last several years. It is a real problem. There are more people living in slavery conditions today than at any other point in human history.
The world is full of vulnerable people without support systems. It’s clear that they are all too often exploited.
QAnon was a psyop meant to distract the right. But like all good psyops, it contained elements of truth. There’s a reason QAnon took off, and it’s not because all it’s adherents are stupid sheep.
If you want to dive deeper, check this channel out on Bitchute.
In my view, the goal of Q was to mix truth with obvious bullshit, so that they could debunk the BS, and paint the whole situation with that brush. It was very successful.
Epstein’s business was collecting blackmail on powerful people. He had this painting hanging in his house at the same time that he was friends with Billy.
This is Bill wearing the infamous blue dress. Epstein had him by the short and curlies.
All too often, once people have real power, and can get almost anything they want, they begin to want things they cannot have. It’s a common trope.
There are myriad “conspiracy theories” regarding human trafficking, and it seems to come up in the news all too often.
Here’s another one which is worth looking into. Where there’s smoke, there’s fire, and the elites do not seem to care all that much about it.
It was James Comey’s daughter who prosecuted Maxwell, and she was able to successfully cover up the list as a result. How do you find someone guilty of trafficking, with no evidence of whom they were trafficking to? Incredibly suspect.
My Analysis of Tate
I firmly believe in due process - innocent until proven guilty and all that. The point here, is not to say what he did or didn’t do. That’s for the courts - including the court of public opinion.
I agree with maybe 80-90% of what the guy says. He is brilliant, charming, articulate, shrewd, and even charismatic. The message he has for young men is overwhelmingly positive. By the time he came on the scene, I’d learned most of this from life experience, but I would have killed to have access to someone like that in my 20’s.
His message to young men is desperately needed. So many talented young men feel that there doesn’t seem to be any point in trying. They have stacked the deck against them in every conceivable way.
They want you weak, fat, low T, compliant - essentially incapable of revolution.
I also think that he uses scummy, scammy tactics to manipulate the fears and insecurities of his audience to get them to sent him money.
Here’s what my thoughts were on him prior to all these allegations surfacing.
Just because I agree with someone, and they seem to be “on my team” that doesn’t mean they’re decent human beings. People are complicated, and they rarely tell you the whole story.
Tate doesn’t pass the “smell test” for me. I think the chances that he was involved in shady/illegal businesses is 100%.
As a side note, always trust your intuition - it will be wrong sometimes, but it’s the best bet you can make. The animal instincts can save your life.
When something seems too good to be true, it is. And Tate seemed too good to be true in many ways. Also his rise from relative obscurity seemed “manufactured” - much in the same way Epstein did.
Aspie note: I found out an Epstein when I was living in the Virgin Islands for a couple months. Lots of rumors about what was going on on that island, it was an open secret. Yet he operated with impunity for years, despite many things about him not adding up. Why did Les Wexner gift him the most expensive house in Manhattan? How did he go from teacher, to international financial gooroo?
Back to Tate, many things about him don’t add up. People who are confident and secure, don’t need to flex the way he does. Having nice things is great, needing 30 supercars is pathological. Not only, it’s financially very, very dumb. Which wouldn’t bother me, except he’s trying to market himself as a financial wizard.
It’s a dirty secret that all great fortunes are created through illicit means. The Kennedy’s make their money in rum running, as just one example. If you look, you’ll find many more. Once you have money, you can buy almost anything, including legitimacy.
People who understand personal finance don’t make those kinds of decisions - people obsessed with their own egos do. And it’s not intelligent behavior for his impressionable audience.
I’m not exactly sure where the line is when you’re mega-rich. Could be 3 or 5, or 10 supercars, but at some point, it’s becomes pathological. Thirty cars is pathological flexing. It seems to me the dude has a God complex.
It’s easy to let your ego get out of control when you have the world by the balls - which he does. Connor McGregor comes to mind. Both legitimately charismatic, talented, strategic, etc. I have deep respect for how they both did what they did, it is impressive.
Personally, I don’t have much respect for what it turned them into - self obsessed, arrogant, God complex.
I have no idea if he’s guilty or not. I know it looks bad, and he’s made a lot of statements regarding this that are highly suspect.
If he was running girls on OF, he was also pimping them out, not a doubt in my mind. So does he have any blackmail? He seems like he would be smarter that to paint a target on his back without a plan. But then again, maybe it’s the God complex. It’s really hard to say.
I’m not taking anything at face value though.
There are videos you can easily find on the internet saying things that are very incriminating. Many admissions in his own words do not look good.
But videos are often misleading, and this alone isn’t proof of anything because at the moment, the evidence we have is all circumstantial. He did however, stupidly, paint a target on his back. He should have known better, unless this is 8D chess - which I doubt.
The Matrix Sent Their Agents
It’s clear to me that elite do not give one single, solitary fuck about human trafficking. Andrew’s messages are dangerous to the elite. He was arrested mere days after attempting to slaughter the Sacred Cow of “Climate Justice.”
Regardless of his guilt or innocence, this is obviously revenge on the part of “the Matrix.” There is no doubt in my mind that the powers that be have been waiting for a chance to take him out. Whether or not this is created out of whole cloth, or 100% true, the main reason for it is to shut him up.
Even if all the allegations are true, it’s not nearly as bad as Epstein, not even close. And the same people who covered up for Epstein, are now attacking Andrew with all their power.
The same people responsible for the largest, and most unethical medical experiment in human history, are the same ones who were tied up with Epstein, are the same ones pushing the anti-human, Malthusian “climate justice” agenda. The same ones who want you to eat the bugs and live in the pod. They also have tried everything to shut Tate up.
Conclusion
Andrew had a lot of great messages for young men. He also said a lot of things that are suspect. The kind of “big-boy” money he was dealing with is unlikely to be generated that quickly from a combination of OnlyFans and his Hustlers University. It’s very likely he was involved in some shady shit.
It’s also clear to me that regardless of what he’s into, that’s not why they’re going after him.
Based on your values, it’s not unreasonable to come to one of the following conclusions
1 - Even if he raped the pope, I wouldn’t care, his message is too valuable
2 - Tate is guilty and he should rot in jail
3 - The matrix sent their agents - it’s 100% a frame-up
4 - He’s part of the matrix, and it’s an elaborate hoax, Kayfabe in the vernacular
5 - He’s innocent, and playing 8D chess
I’m not going to tell you which one to pick, because I’m not even sure which one I pick. I’m waiting to see how it shakes out. One thing I am certain of however, is that there are going to be more plot twists no one predicted before it’s all over. And the propaganda is flying from both sides.
Just know that whichever side you’re on, this is complicated, and reasonable people will differ.
My recommendation is to remain open minded, and willing to update your analysis based on new information, and what your gut is telling you.
Until next time - Happy New Year anons.
Gotta wonder where his money really comes from. One thing that Robert Barnes says time and time again, somebody who's wealth can't be explained is usually an asset. Take Jeff Espstein for example. He even made similar remarks in regards to the Vegas shooter.